The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Lemon cuck | 01/06/26 | | Rose famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | Poppy stead regret | 01/06/26 | | Rose famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | Poppy stead regret | 01/06/26 | | Rose famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | Lemon cuck | 01/06/26 | | Rose famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | Lemon cuck | 01/06/26 | | aromatic organic girlfriend | 01/07/26 | | Topaz soul-stirring cuckoldry | 01/06/26 | | Boyish son of senegal | 01/06/26 | | Poppy stead regret | 01/06/26 | | fishy temple | 01/06/26 | | Poppy stead regret | 01/06/26 | | Cracking Milky Abode | 01/06/26 | | disrespectful flushed tattoo whorehouse | 01/06/26 | | Metal menage stock car | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Rose famous landscape painting
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2#49568134) |
|
|