The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
using only SAT for college acceptance means fewer elites and more poors (link)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:01 AM Author: comical flesh locus double fault you’d think libs would support this..
https://x.com/garrytan/status/1958963104462905385 |
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: doobsian lemon idea he suggested It would just result in a ton of high IQ Losers who’d bomb OCI imho. Schools want students who get high GPAs at all costs and who do activities that signal phenotype which predicts OCI success. Unless they put calc II shit on the SAT, Loser liberal artists will over perform imo. Although they changed it to make it less g-loaded iirc in order to oppress Losers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49546957) |
 |
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:05 AM Author: comical flesh locus double fault as opposed to blacks in over their heads or elites who fail to launch?
rhe tweet explicitly says there’s no drop off in post college success |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:07 AM Author: doobsian lemon idea he suggested I didn’t say it was a bad thing. Just that it’s not what these ideologues want. And they’ll create fake jobs for URMs. The Xbox brand is being “led” by a black Woman who aced OCI and doesn’t play video games. Phil Spencer will get the blame and she’ll get Promoted imho.
In other words, US News rankings would take a big hit if a school had a bunch of white Loser grads failing to get jobs. If the less successful students were black they wouldn’t take as much of a hit imho bc Diversity. |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:13 AM Author: fishy soul-stirring rigor school cafeteria No need to bring Xbox into this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49546976) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:13 AM Author: doobsian lemon idea he suggested Phil is soooooooo getting fired (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49546977) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:15 AM Author: fishy soul-stirring rigor school cafeteria he's doing something right or else he would've been fired already afaik. he's Gen X ffs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49546978) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 2:37 PM Author: doobsian lemon idea he suggested He would’ve just quit if he had a shred of dignity. Or jumped ship lol.
MSFT is just so big and has so much $$$ they’re giving him a graceful exit like a biglaw firm imo |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: well-lubricated location half-breed Yeah now run the numbers for niggers and beaners (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49546958) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:25 AM Author: Naked set The most selective colleges should hold lotteries among their qualified applicant pool of 99th percentile SAT scorers with some additional criteria like required SAT subject tests in Calc and Physics. Grades, ECs, race, and legacy status shouldn't be factors. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49546999) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 1:47 PM Author: comical flesh locus double fault meed to get rid of the cash cow “departments” first so that only actually smart people apply
prestigious trade schools with top masters in shit like management and leadership should take their place |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 2:34 PM Author: Seedy Insanely Creepy Library Sneaky Criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49547522) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 2:41 PM Author: Odious national roommate Mark Simon @MarkSimonHK
Actually it's sports that are the best predictor of success in life, not SAT's. Isn't an education about a better life, not just "academic success".
A 2023 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) study by Paul Gompers and colleagues found that Ivy League varsity athletes earn approximately 3.4% more over their careers than their non-athlete peers, controlling for factors like school, major, graduation year, and first job. Athletes also tend to attain more senior positions. The study suggests that athletic participation builds non-academic human capital (e.g., resilience, teamwork, time management) valued in the labor market.
https://x.com/MarkSimonHK/status/1958972602506256611
damn this is a trvth nvke
sorry gookbots, the white chads win again |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 2:45 PM Author: doobsian lemon idea he suggested Clique Theory strikes again (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49547546) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 2:46 PM Author: Seedy Insanely Creepy Library Sneaky Criminal Probably some misplaced causality here. The white Chads who are bound for leadership are more likely to spend their college years playing sports. Still some causality though. A lot of it has to do with peer group, making connections, following the example of the guys a couple years ahead that you look up to, etc. Also would be fascinating to see a study on the impact of joining a social club, which is highly linked to athletic participation in the Ivies. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49547547) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 3:34 PM Author: comical flesh locus double fault 3.4% more money, 340% more pussy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2#49547642) |
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 6:30 PM Author: Copper wonderful box office dysfunction yeah thats why samsung hyundai and LG CEOs are all cumskin
|
|
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:34 PM Author: Territorial Claret Party Of The First Part Don't understand how anyone can think that something like teacher recommendations should be a major factor.
It'd be fair if the teachers were like "Pick this kid, not this kid" - but they're all obviously writing hte best recommendation they can for each student.
Seems absolutely insane that students should be admitted based on how well their teacher can advocate for them. You could plausibly say you should give preferential treatment to the kids with "bad" recommendations because they're teachers are stupid. |