Elon Musk

@elonmusk

Double-digit growth is coming within 12 to 18 months.

If applied intelligence is proxy for economic growth, which it should be, triple-digit is possible in ~5 years.

8:20 AM · Dec 24, 2025

·

3.2M

Views

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49654723)

Jeffrey Weichsel

@jeffreyweichsel

·

Dec 24, 2025

Massive deflation of goods and services plus unprecedented economic growth equals universal prosperity for all humanity.

Thank you, Elon!

***

Has anyone investigated whether TBF's last name might be "Weichsel"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49654750)

IMO, people with money who think that Elon Musk (aka by far the richest man in the world -- he's now literally 2.5x as rich as the 2nd richest man thanks to his various tech companies) is some kind of delusional midwit retard who doesn't understand finance / tech and is just pulling shit out of his ass should absolutely be shorting TSLA, since that's the only way to directly place a bet against him. And it's a "win-win" for them because just as long as their short hits, they also score a nice big easy payday!

OP: you seem like you're probably very smart and successful, and you clearly hate Elon -- so are you using any of your own substantial assets to short TSLA? ;)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49654761)

I'm like dude no one in my ultra liberal progressive area killed themselves over not being trans. Like do you people at least acknowledge that no one actually ever killed themselves because they couldn't transition? No one thought about it. And I'm from a place that's as gay and left wing as anywhere in the Bay Area.

When I was growing up we had a ton of homos in school, we had girls who were really into cutting themselves. That was the thing. But nobody, not one kid stood up and say actually I'm a girl. Not one. No one thought about it because it wasn't on the menu. And there were no suicides. So what is this ridiculous myth that people were killing themselves because they couldn't go trans? This is utterly ridiculous there's zero evidence for it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49655851)

You're making the same analytical mistake that was the basis of the Cass Report -- that the only relevant metric for evaluating the efficacy of "gender-affirming care" should be its effect on suicidality. If you think about it, you'll realize that there are precisely zero other healthcare interventions where that is considered the only relevant metric. For example, we aren't administering SSRIs to 30% of white women because they would kill themselves if they didn't get it, but just because they self-report improvements of QOL. Same with Finasteride, Adderall, boob implants, penile implants, leg-lengthening, etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49655869)

Just to be clear are you 100% unequivocally agreeing that suicidality is not a major concern when it comes to transitioning minors? I assume you now agree with the lawsuit out of Westchester where the doc and psychologist told the mom that her daughter would literally be dead if she didn't get a double mastectomy? Per your point of view, that was not true. Are you fully admitting that the people who said would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter were lying? Do I have this 100% absolutely clear?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49655891)

It is in fact a major concern, because kids with gender problems have more than four times greater rates of suicide attempts compared with their cisgender peers. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9991447/. My point (which shouldn't be confusing to any intelligent person) is that that isn't the *only relevant consideration, although it was treated as such in the Cass Report. And obv these people have lots of other mental health problems such that gender affirming care wouldn't be expected to bring their suicidality equal to that of cis-kids.

Your other argument is also reflective of the intellectual limits of xo2026: "That's great data, BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS ANECDOTE I SAW ON MY TWITTER FEED??!"

It's plain that you lack either one or both of the interest or the intellect to really explore these issues, which is why I much prefer engaging with gunneratttt.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49655971)

Let's agree on some facts. Kids who seek a sex change are way more likely to be nuts than the average kid. Ok we can agree on that. They're more likely to be schizo, (perhaps?) come from a fucked up family, suicidality, you name it. It's obviously not something normal, healthy people do. Minor (heh) quibbles aside, let's just establish this axiom. These kids are nuts. You can stack up all the comorbidities you want.

Now I read the Cass report but I can't remember a single word it said because I subsequently forgot about it and moved on with my life. In your first poast you argued that suicidality was not the only factor. I said well if it's not the only factor, is it a factor at all? Now you're telling me it is a factor, but still not the only factor. It's having your cake and eating it too. You (not you personally, but your side) can waive around the notion that trans kids are suicidal and need are help in order to bully people into thinking they need this care. But then on the back end you're saying, well, 𝘦𝘯 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘴 these kids are fucked up so now it's not a matter of life and death, they may just be nuts anyway, there's little we can do, but the proper course of action is to listen to them with radical empathy and if they want to make an irreversible life-altering decision at an incredibly young age (young enough that we arrest chomos for going near them because they cannot consent) society should accept this and proceed. But we've now seen with detransitioners a lot of people come out and say, 'this therapy didn't fix my problems.'

You essentially made an argument that gender transitioning is palliative care. It's not the end all be all of a person's problems (surprisingly, agreed!). You said it's for a person's comfort and quality of life, just like how some people booze, take pills, or SSRIs. No acknowledgment whatsoever that people who medicate or self-medicate can always, you know, stop without permanent life-altering changes to their bodies.

You like gunneratttt because he indulges you. I am listening to every word but still disagreeing. You should be a lot more hardened at this point to someone making legitimate rhetorical points, here. Sad to see you crash out over this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49656000)

Can you link directly to the Tweet that comprises your data for this assertion?

Cf. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9991447/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49655979)

(tbf)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832313&forum_id=2#49655871)